Compare free and paid music distribution on fees, royalty splits, rights and takedown risk — and learn which is right for independent artists and labels.
When you choose how to distribute your music, the headline question is simple: should you pay, or go free? Both models can get you onto Spotify and Apple Music — the difference is in fees, royalty splits, rights and what happens if you stop paying.
Paid services usually charge either per release or an annual subscription. Some let you keep royalties under the applicable plan and agreement; others take a cut. The risk: with subscription models, if you stop paying, your catalogue can be taken down.
A free distributor like Mazufa Records charges nothing to upload, takes no royalty cut, and keeps your music live without recurring fees. You retain ownership of your work subject to your agreement and earnings.
| Factor | Typical paid | Mazufa (free) |
|---|---|---|
| Upload cost | Per release or yearly | See current plan |
| Royalty cut | 0–15%+ | Fees and deductions follow the current plan and agreement — you keep Ownership and royalties follow the applicable agreement |
| Stays live if you stop paying | Often no | Yes |
| Stores reached | Varies | Availability varies by service territory eligibility and current terms across available territories |
If a paid service offers something specific you need, it can be worth it. But for most independent artists and labels, free distribution that keeps ownership subject to your agreement and royalties — with no risk of takedown — is the smarter default. Start with our services overview or read how to release on Spotify.
Prepare eligible releases for supported digital services with clear current-plan terms while retaining ownership subject to your agreement.